I just sat down and saw this discussion between Jimmy's songs and Jameson Rops on Bitcoin's bone. I don't even know where to start from all discussions in this discussion in this discussion. So I don't try it, I focus on one specific discussion he has.
“Money should not change. It is possible.”
From a technical perspective he talks specifically along these lines regarding “mature things” in this space, and implicitly states that the upgrade to bitcoin “draws the rug from below”. Masu.
Does Jimmy understand the bitcoin upgrade mechanism? We have been using SoftForks for over 10 years Specifically, in order to deal with concerns about compatibility in the opposite direction。 In other words, if everything you have built so far continues to work in exactly the same, you can say 100 % reliably. All upgrades of Bitcoin are opt -in, and everything that existed before is functioning normally, and if the developers or users do not want, there is no need to change them to support new features.
Jimmy's statements and discussions in line with these policies have no technical foundation. A new feature that enables new protocols or tools will not inhibit the continuous features of existing systems.
So what is he saying? For me, it sounds like an essentially economic protection. Threats, risks, or problems created in the existing system after the upgrade after the upgrade, or the user is to use them instead of the upgrade. It is the only consistent discussion drawn from these statements.
So, are we seriously argued that “professional processors” argue for protective decision -making for existing investments on the current layers and systems?
Please see it yourself
This article is A take。 The statements that have been expressed are completely authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine.
