- Ethereum's co-founders aim to measure alignment with the project's core values to address issues of decentralization and cooperation.
- Focus on values (open source, low centralization), technology (ecosystem standards), and economics (use of ETH).
- To ensure interoperability, critical infrastructure must be open sourced.
- We encourage the evaluation of third-party adjustments towards a more meritocratic Ethereum ecosystem.
Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin introduced a proposal to measure how well a project aligns with Ethereum's core values. In a recent blog post, Buterin highlighted a key social challenge in the Ethereum ecosystem: achieving a balance between decentralization and cooperation.
This diverse effort creates a healthy and thriving network of developers, researchers, and community groups working toward their specific visions for Ethereum's future. The risk is that there is no ecosystem per se, but fragmented and incompatible systems.
For this reason, Buterin suggests expressing the meaning of Ethereum correction more clearly, starting by clearly defining Ethereum correction through concrete metrics. According to him, Ethereum alignment means alignment in three areas: value alignment, technical alignment, and economic alignment.
Value alignment is based on open source code, decentralization, and support for public goods. Technically aligned means complying with ecosystem-wide standards, and economically aligned means prioritizing the use of ETH as the native token whenever possible .
Historically, the term coordination has often been very vague and almost always results in an imbalance of power. Buterin now wants to change this situation by proposing clearly defined metrics on how to evaluate the above adjustments so that projects within the ecosystem generate positive external contributions to Ethereum's long-term vision. That's what I think.
Ethereum open source principles and standards
This is an open source proposal. As Buterin pointed out, not everything has to be open source, but critical infrastructure should be open source to avoid proprietary lock-in and allow improvements to be made in unauthorized ways. There is a need.
There should also be a focus on open standards that answer questions of interoperability within the ecosystem. He also suggests evaluating projects for their level of compatibility with existing ether standards such as ERC-20 and ERC-1271.
Buterin also mentioned two other important indicators: decentralization and security. He describes two major tests. One is whether the application will survive intact if the project team disappears, and the other is how much damage an attacker can do to the system if a particular team actively attempts to compromise it. . These metrics aim to minimize dependence on centralized infrastructure while simultaneously increasing security.
Going forward, Buterin will see third-party companies like L2beat begin to quantify how well projects actually meet these standards. Such an organization would foster competition based on collaboration rather than social ties, and provide a clearer path for stakeholders, including the Ether Foundation, to support projects that actively contribute within the ecosystem. You will.
Buterin believes that by making the concept of coordination more measurable, this design will make the Ethereum ecosystem meritocratic, transparent, and fair, while ensuring the growth of a cohesive and inclusive network. I feel it.
Related Books | Cryptocurrency in the spotlight at the 2024 Tsinghua PBC Forum: Risks and global policy shifts
