In this ecosystem, something has fundamentally changed. A major change in the core spirit of things. Regardless of what you are thinking about politics in a wider world, bitcoin itself is a network and protocol, and it works in a hostile environment in an environment where politics and government are actively hostile to it. It was explicitly designed.
Bitcoin itself is a core value proposition that can continue its functions as a system, despite such hostility in a hostile environment. It can be a foundation for our construct, and it is inherited to some extent in the face of allied hostels on it.
The religion for the core value proposal seems to be almost completely evaporated by this ecosystem. It seems that the determination to build on the foundation and pay all sacrifice to its soundness has evaporated. Instead, we have cheerleading politicians. It supports trading for useful regulations, and has priority on short -term financial interests to preserve bitcoin in the first place.
People are not very interested in the webs that are the basis of Bitcoin's openness and censorship resistance. just Pick up our bags or pump the bags.
We count our chicken before chicken converts Hatch.
Bitcoin has a problem with the concentration of mining businesses, and some of the vulnerabilities in the ecosystem's regulatory attacks may risk the ability to use the network openly without fear of censorship. A power of attorney from the government. There is a problem from a scalability perspective, it is a executable means to actually protest, and the ability to support sufficient users independently using the network to opt out on a large scale for the government. there is. Otherwise, people are as regulated as the mining is becoming more and more regulated. There is also a serious privacy problem, and users begin to self -censorship with regulated pressure.
Bitcoin has all these problems, not focusing on those solutions Therefore, bitcoin can continue to be a valuable resilience system in the first place.People pay the victory of tokens and the victory of tokens policy and short -term financial interests at the expense of major concessions that can seriously impair the basics of bitcoin. I am more interested in the favor.
So where did we make the wrong turn? And frankly, what is wrong for everyone?
This article is A take。 The statements that have been expressed are completely authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine.
